Difference in shares who say the U.S. and China interfere in the affairs of other countries
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q22 & Q29.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
In recent years, views of the United States and China have changed a lot. This year, the U.S. is largely viewed positively in the 24 countries we surveyed. At the same time, China is seen much more negatively
– especially in high-income countries. But favorability does not tell
the whole story. Both countries are seen positively in some ways and
negatively in others.
Based on surveys conducted in 24
countries, we examine how the U.S. and China stack up to one another on
more than 10 different measures, spanning from confidence in their
leaders to views of their universities and technological achievements.
We focus on the difference in how people see the two superpowers.
Take
one aspect of foreign policy as an example. In Greece, 93% say the U.S.
interferes in the affairs of other countries, compared with 56% who say
the same for China, for a difference of 37 percentage points. The Greek
flag is therefore plotted farther to the left, closer to the U.S. end
of the scale, at 37.
Australians, though, see little difference
between the superpowers and consider both the U.S. (79%) and China (77%)
to be interventionist powers. The Australian flag is therefore plotted
at 2, close to the midpoint, which represents no difference in ratings
of the two countries on this measure.
Across all 24 countries
surveyed, we see that while majorities in most countries see both the
U.S. and China as prone to interfering in the affairs of other
countries, the U.S. is almost always more likely to be described this
way. All of the flags are thus generally to the left of the midpoint and
closer to the U.S. end. These metrics can be viewed for each country by
hovering over that country’s flag.
Ratings of whether the U.S.
and China take each country’s interests into account paints a somewhat
different picture. Most flags are still to the left of the midpoint –
and closer to the U.S. end – because more people across countries say
the U.S. accounts for their country’s interests than China. But the
flags are more spread out across the scale because publics feel quite
differently from one another about this.
We can also see
differences between middle- and high-income countries.1 Selecting
middle-income countries on the bottom right of the graphic shows that
middle-income countries are mostly clustered together around the
midpoint of the scale and that they evaluate the U.S. and China
similarly.
Conversely, selecting high-income countries shows
that they are clustered together on the left, giving higher ratings to
the U.S. than China when it comes to accounting for other countries’
interests.
The U.S. also gets higher marks for contributing to
global peace and stability than China does, and the differences in
evaluations are often 30 points or more. The difference is greatest in
Japan, where 79% say the U.S. contributes at least a fair amount to
international stability and just 14% say the same of China – a
difference of 65 points. While still large in many countries,
differences are smaller in many middle-income countries. And in
Indonesia and Hungary, U.S. and Chinese contributions to global peace
and stability are seen in a similar light.
As the charts above
show, views of China and the U.S. vary a lot among the 24 countries
surveyed. Besides foreign policy, you can compare views of China and the
U.S. on a few other measures. To see charts and analysis for those
topics, keep scrolling or select a topic from the list below.
COMPARE U.S. AND CHINA BY:
Favorable views of the U.S. and China
Difference in shares who say they have favorable views of the U.S. and China
Opinion
skews toward the U.S. most heavily in the high-income countries
surveyed, with differences of 50 percentage points or more in favor of
the U.S. in Poland, Japan and South Korea. In all three countries, more
than seven-in-ten offer positive ratings of the U.S., and fewer than
three-in-ten have favorable opinions of China.
In most
middle-income countries surveyed, views of both powers are generally
positive, leading to a smaller difference in views. Nigeria is the lone
public surveyed with warmer opinions of China than of the U.S., though
both the U.S. and China receive positive ratings from large majorities
of Nigerians.
Hungary – notably the only country where positive ratings of the U.S. are the minority
opinion – and Kenya stand out for having near equal shares of adults
who rate the U.S. and China favorably. Just under half offer positive
ratings of each superpower in Hungary, and roughly seven-in-ten Kenyans
see the U.S. and China favorably.
Is favorability of the U.S. and China zero-sum?
An
alternate way to think about favorability is to look at whether
individuals in a given country hold positive views of one superpower and
not the other – essentially a “zero-sum” mindset.
In nine
countries, this seems to be the case: A majority or plurality has
favorable views of the U.S. but not China. In both Japan and Poland, 63%
of adults have a favorable view of the U.S. and an unfavorable view of
China.
Particularly in middle-income countries, though,
pluralities of a third or more have favorable views of both world
powers. This includes majorities in both Nigeria and Kenya. No more than
a fifth of adults in any country surveyed have a favorable opinion of
China and an unfavorable opinion of the U.S.
Leading economic power
Difference in shares who say the U.S. and China are the world’s leading economic power
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q10.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
The U.S. economy is larger than China’s but has tended to grow less per year, at least until recently. Still, the U.S. is considered by most surveyed publics to be the world’s leading economic power.
And, in many countries, this sense is growing. In Sweden, for example,
51% now say that the U.S. is the leading economy, compared with 39% in
2020, when they were more likely to give the title to China.
South
Koreans are especially likely to see the U.S. as the world’s top
economy, with 83% giving the title to the U.S. compared with just 8% to
China. Sizable differences of around 40 percentage points in favor of
the U.S. are also seen in Japan, Poland, Israel and India.
Still,
five countries – most of which are in Europe – see China as the leading
economy. This includes Italy, which is the only country where a
majority considers China the world’s leading economy.
Investment from the U.S. and China
In 12 countries, people were asked if American and Chinese investment have benefited their economies.2
In
Australia, Indonesia, Kenya and South Africa, similar shares see
investments from both superpowers as having helped their country’s
economy at least a fair amount. Conversely, Argentines are equally
likely to see Chinese and U.S. investment as having not benefited their
country’s economy.
For those in Israel, Poland, India, Brazil and Mexico, U.S. investment is seen as more beneficial.
Only
in Hungary and Nigeria is Chinese investment seen more favorably than
U.S. investment. Even then, 74% of Nigerians say investment from the
U.S. has benefited their country at least a fair amount.
Ratings of American and Chinese technology
Difference in shares who say U.S. and Chinese technology is above average or the best compared with other wealthy nations
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q20d & Q31d. Spring 2021 Global Attitudes Survey. Q15e.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
The U.S. and China are both widely seen as technological powerhouses. For example, together they dominate the global digital market. Between Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS, American companies have the vast majority of the mobile operating system market share worldwide. Yet China leads the charge toward 5G and global network coverage.
Across
the 24 countries surveyed, a median of 72% describe U.S. technology as
the best or above average and 69% say the same of Chinese technology.
And evaluations of the two superpowers’ technological prowess differ
little in seven countries. For example, 83% of Spaniards say American
technology is above average or the best, compared with 82% who say the
same for China.
Seven publics give U.S. technology more positive
ratings. Among them, Israelis and South Koreans stand out for their
favorable evaluations of American technology relative to Chinese
technology; this is driven by Israelis’ high ratings of American
technology and South Koreans’ low ratings of Chinese technology.
China’s
technology is seen more positively in 10 countries, including in the
U.S. Technological achievements are the only measure where Americans see
China outpacing the U.S. About two-thirds of American adults (66%) say
China’s technology is above average or the best, compared with 56% who
say the same about their own country.
There is little
distinction between middle- and high-income countries’ ratings of either
country’s technology, but some regional patterns do emerge. China’s
technological achievements are rated more positively in the Latin
American countries surveyed, while the Asian countries included give the
U.S. more positive marks.
Quality of American and Chinese technology products
Respondents in 12 countries further evaluated technology from the U.S. and China on their quality and other attributes.
Roughly
three-quarters or more in each country surveyed say American products
are well-made, including 94% in Nigeria and 92% in Israel. China’s
technology gets more variable ratings,
with 82% in Nigeria saying it’s well-made compared with just 36% in
Israel. Israel is the lone country to have a majority say China’s
technological products are poorly made.
Respondents were also
asked about the price of technology products from either country. A
12-country median of 77% call American products expensive, while 42% say
the same of Chinese products.
With regards to data security,
views are mixed. On balance, people are more likely to say technology
produced by American companies protects personal data than to say the
same of Chinese companies.
Still, the shares who say American
technology protects personal data range from 81% in Nigeria to 25% in
Hungary. China’s technology garners similarly varied opinion, with 78%
in Nigeria saying it protects users’ personal data but just 15% of
Australians saying the same.
Earlier this year, as TikTok faced a potential ban in the U.S., most Americans were similarly distrusting when asked about data privacy and the behavior of Chinese social media companies.
Ratings of American and Chinese militaries
Difference in shares who say the U.S. and Chinese militaries are above average or the best compared with other wealthy nations
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q20c & Q31c. Spring 2021 Global Attitudes Survey. Q15d.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
The U.S. and China are home to two of the world’s largest militaries. China’s active forces are nearly double the size of the United States’, though the U.S. outspends China on defense.
Majorities
in every country surveyed say the American military is above average or
the best, while the same is only true for China in about half of the
countries surveyed.
In most countries surveyed, the U.S.
military receives significantly higher ratings than China’s. There are
three exceptions: In Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, all NATO allies
of the U.S., the United States’ and China’s militaries are about
equally likely to be considered above average or the best. However, the
U.S. military gets more recognition than China’s when considering only
those who say each is the best.
Israelis stand out for their
near unanimous positive ratings of the U.S. forces. While a majority of
Israelis rate China’s military highly, the 39-point gap in ratings is
the largest of any country surveyed.
Unlike other measures of
hard and soft power, there is little difference in ratings of the
American and Chinese militaries between middle- and high-income
countries.
American and Chinese entertainment
Difference in shares who say U.S. and Chinese entertainment is above average or the best compared with other wealthy nations
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q20e & Q31e. Spring 2021 Global Attitudes Survey. Q15f.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
In 2020, China replaced the U.S. as the world’s largest film market after a number of successful local productions, and its government released a five-year improvement plan for its film industry a year later. Most of the top 10 highest grossing films globally were nonetheless still American productions in 2022.
Global
views of entertainment from each country parallel these trends. U.S.
entertainment – including its music, movies and television – is more
than four times more likely to be seen as the best or above average than
China’s (a 24-country median of 71% vs. 17%, respectively).
High-income
countries view American entertainment more favorably than middle-income
countries. Entertainment ratings skew toward the U.S. most heavily in
Israel, where adults are 71 percentage points more likely to call
American entertainment, rather than Chinese, above average or the best.
Differences greater than 60 points in favor of the U.S. are also seen
among the Dutch, Italians, Poles and Swedes.
The sub-Saharan
African publics surveyed offer the highest praise for Chinese
entertainment, especially in Nigeria, where 67% say it is the best or
above average. Even so, each public gives U.S. entertainment higher
ratings.
American and Chinese universities
Difference in shares who say U.S. and Chinese universities are above average or the best compared with other wealthy nations
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q20a & Q31a. Spring 2021 Global Attitudes Survey. Q15b.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
In May 2023, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced plans for bolstering China’s education system to spread its global influence and create a “‘Study in China’ brand.” Currently, out of the top 100 universities in the world, as rated by the Times Higher Education, only seven are in China, whereas 34 are in the U.S.
This
disparity is reflected in views of the two countries’ universities.
Across the 24 countries surveyed, a median of 68% say U.S. universities
are above average or the best, while just 35% say the same of China’s.
Universities
in the U.S. receive significantly more positive ratings than
universities in China in all countries surveyed. Middle-income countries
give both countries’ universities some of the most favorable
evaluations, but the gap in the ratings of the two are similar to the
gaps seen in high-income countries.
Europe is home to some of
the largest differences as well as the smallest. Poles, Greeks and
Hungarians are at least 40 points more likely to say American
universities are above average or the best than Chinese universities.
The differences are much smaller – in large part due to less positive
outlooks on American universities – in the Netherlands, Germany and the
UK.
Notably, the U.S. has one of the least positive perceptions
of American universities, along with several other advanced economies.
About half in each saying American universities are the best or above
average.
American and Chinese standards of living
Difference
in shares who say U.S. and Chinese standards of living are above
average or the best compared with other wealthy nations
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q20b & Q31b. Spring 2021 Global Attitudes Survey. Q15c.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
As of 2021, both the U.S. and China fall above the world average on the United Nations’ Human Development Index,
but the U.S. is considered a very high human development country while
China is labeled a high human development country. The difference is
reflected in international ratings of the two countries’ standards of
living. Though ratings of both vary greatly, greater shares say the
standard of living in the U.S. is above average or the best in every
country surveyed.
Israelis and Poles stand out for holding
particularly skewed views of each country’s standard of living, in favor
of the U.S. In Israel and Poland, roughly eight-in-ten regard the
standard of living in the U.S. in high regard, while 9% and 19% say the
same of China, respectively.
In several high-income countries,
ratings of the standard of living are low for both the U.S. and China.
For example, just 16% of Germans see the standard of living in the U.S.
as above average or the best and 8% say the same of China. In
comparison, middle-income countries offer some of the most positive
evaluations of the standards of living in the two economic powerhouses.
Respect for personal freedoms
Difference in shares who say the U.S. and China respect the personal freedoms of their people
Note: Publics are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2021 Global Attitudes Survey. Q6a & b.
The U.S. is generally considered by experts to be more democratic than China. Among other organizations, Freedom House describes the U.S. as “free” and China as “not free,” and International IDEA labels the U.S. a “democracy” versus China’s “authoritarian regime.”
Public opinion follows the same pattern. In a survey of 17 high-income publics in 2021, the U.S. government was far more likely than the Chinese government to be seen as respecting its people’s personal freedoms, and previous surveys
of both high- and middle-income countries have recorded similar
findings. The U.S. government was seen as more respectful of its
people’s personal freedoms than China’s even as it received increasingly
negative ratings between 2013 and 2018.
In 2021, the
differences between ratings of the United States’ and China’s treatment
of personal freedoms were especially pronounced in South Korea and
Taiwan. In both, roughly three-quarters said the U.S. respects its
people’s personal freedoms compared with only about one-in-ten who said
the same for China. Differences of about 50 percentage points or more
were also measured across most of Europe. Conversely, Singapore stood
out for having the smallest difference and being the most likely to
consider China respectful of its people’s personal freedoms.
Confidence in the American and Chinese presidents
Difference
in shares who say they have confidence in U.S. President Joe Biden and
Chinese President Xi Jinping to do the right thing regarding world
affairs
Note: Countries are plotted by the difference in evaluations of the U.S. and China.
Source: Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey. Q15a & b.
High-income countries
Middle-income countries
When
it comes to leaders, global publics are nearly three times more likely
to have confidence in U.S. President Joe Biden than in Chinese President
Xi Jinping (medians across 23 countries, not including the U.S., of 54%
and 19%, respectively). Each country surveyed is more likely to have
confidence in Biden than Xi, but this has not always been the case for
ratings of the U.S. president.
The gap in confidence ratings of the U.S. president and the Chinese president has shifted greatly in the last 10 years
with each American leader. Views of the two leaders were most similar
in several countries when former President Donald Trump held office.
Views
of Biden and Xi differ across high- and middle-income countries. Those
in middle-income countries are more likely to rate Biden and Xi
similarly. For example, 71% of Nigerians have confidence in Biden, while
62% say the same of Xi – a 9-point difference.
In high-income countries, the gap tends to be much larger – especially in parts of Europe, including Poland and Sweden.
In
many places, though, respondents are less likely to offer an opinion on
Xi than Biden. For example, in Hungary, 24% of respondents said they
did not know the answer or declined to answer when asked about their
confidence in Xi, while only 6% responded similarly when asked about
Biden.
Rubén Weinsteiner
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה